BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Reform for Illinois - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Reform for Illinois
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.reformforillinois.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Reform for Illinois
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20240310T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20241103T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20250309T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20251102T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20260308T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20261101T070000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20250219T140000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20250219T150000
DTSTAMP:20260428T203953
CREATED:20250203T180524Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250203T180619Z
UID:35413-1739973600-1739977200@www.reformforillinois.org
SUMMARY:Civil Disagreements: Bribes\, Gratuities\, and Corruption after Snyder v. U.S.
DESCRIPTION:In 2024\, the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Snyder v. United States held that the federal law banning public officials from accepting certain payments (18 U.S.C. § 666) only criminalizes bribes received in exchange for official acts. Under that ruling\, the statute does not apply to “gratuities” or gifts—such as gift cards or lunches—given for past acts absent a quid pro quo agreement between the payor and the official. \nThe Court explained that “[b]ribes” are “payments made or agreed to before an official act” to influence the official to carry out “that future official act.” By contrast\, “gratuities” are payments made “after an official act\,” “with no agreement beforehand\,” and “are not the same as bribes before the official act.” Having made that distinction\, the Court said that “American law generally treats bribes as inherently corrupt and unlawful . . . [b]ut the law’s treatment of gratuities is more nuanced.” \nWhat does the Snyder ruling mean for bribery prosecutions in Illinois and across the country? Could this decision spur changes to state anti-corruption laws?  \nCivil Disagreements is a series of moderated debates on current\, critical\, and often contentious civic questions sponsored by Reform for Illinois\, the American Bar Association’s Division for Public Education\, the American Constitution Society (Chicago and Austin\, TX chapters)\, and the Federalist Society (Chicago chapter). 
URL:https://www.reformforillinois.org/event/civil-disagreements-bribery/
LOCATION:Zoom
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.reformforillinois.org/wp-content/uploads/BribesGratuities.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR