BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Reform for Illinois - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.reformforillinois.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Reform for Illinois
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20240310T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20241103T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20250309T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20251102T070000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:20260308T080000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:20261101T070000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Chicago:20250603T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/Chicago:20250603T133000
DTSTAMP:20260428T143448
CREATED:20250520T200646Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250520T200646Z
UID:35530-1748952000-1748957400@www.reformforillinois.org
SUMMARY:Civil Disagreements: Power\, Liberty\, and Regulation after Chevron
DESCRIPTION:Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overturned the Chevron doctrine\, a legal precedent that guided how federal courts treated agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Under the Chevron doctrine\, a court would prioritize an agency’s interpretation\, citing the agency employees’ expertise in the relevant data\, science\, and general subject matter. Environmental issues\, for example\, would be best handled by the Environmental Protection Agency. This allowed federal agencies to enact regulations in many areas–e.g. environmental protection\, healthcare\, labor\, worker safety. Striking down the doctrine means courts will no longer automatically defer to agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous laws; instead\, they will exercise independent judgment. This decision reduces the power of federal agencies to interpret statutes broadly and potentially shifts more authority to the courts and\, indirectly\, to states. States might have greater freedom to enact their own laws and regulations to address problems\, potentially leading to a more fragmented regulatory landscape across the country. States could also challenge federal regulations they deem too burdensome or not aligned with their priorities\, leading to a potentially more decentralized and varied approach to addressing national issues. \nJoin us for a panel discussion about how this decision might shape regulations in Illinois and across the country. \nCivil Disagreements is a series of moderated debates on current\, critical\, and often contentious civic questions sponsored by Reform for Illinois\, the American Bar Association’s Division for Public Education\, the American Constitution Society (Chicago and Austin\, TX chapters)\, and the Federalist Society (Chicago chapter). 
URL:https://www.reformforillinois.org/event/civil-disagreements-chevron/
LOCATION:Zoom
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.reformforillinois.org/wp-content/uploads/AfterChevron.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR